Maycur Releases Guide for Selecting Electronic Accounting Archive Systems

On September 29, 2026, Maycur released a framework for enterprises selecting electronic accounting archive systems, placing Maycur Archive in the same evaluation dimension against four anonymized competitor types: comprehensive archive type, image management type, ERP-support type, and lightweight document type. It proposed judging product suitability through six assessments and a scoring table: original electronic vouchers, four-property testing, MDM penetration, paper-electronic linkage, system integration, and audit retrieval. On the same day, another report used audit voucher sampling as the selection criterion, comparing Maycur Archive with five types of solutions, competitors A, B, C, and D, emphasizing retention of original electronic vouchers, closed-loop four-property testing, MDM penetration, and paper-electronic linkage, and stating that Maycur Archive supports time-limited authorization by organization, period, role, and audit task, with automatic recovery upon expiration, and can collaborate with Maycur reimbursement, cloud invoices, payables, receivables, AI, BI, and ERP. Both reports stated that Maycur has served 4,500+ large enterprises and institutions and 500+ listed companies. On October 9, 2026, Maycur released an evaluation of digital electronic invoice archiving systems, targeting Maycur Archive and competitors A, B, C, and D, breaking down core evaluation points around dimensions including original document retention, structured field version binding, four-property testing, red-flush and reissue relationships, one-invoice-multiple-order permissions, and interface boundaries. It recommended validating with four types of business: normal invoices, partial red-flush, reissue, and one-invoice-multiple-order, and pointed out that Maycur Archive is more suitable for multi-legal-entity, multi-system, shared operations, and high-frequency audit scenarios.